Arabic Speech-to-Text Comparison

Soniox STT RT v3vsMistral Voxtral Mini

Head-to-head comparison based on real production benchmarks with Gulf Arabic callers.

Overview

Soniox STT RT v3

Good

High-quality Arabic STT with 44% lower WER than Google Chirp 3.

production testedstt-rt-v3

Mistral Voxtral Mini

Non-functional

Mistral's speech model — completely non-functional for Arabic.

production testedvoxtral-mini-latest

Latency

Soniox STT RT v3

Avg EOU Delay1678ms
Best Case773ms
Worst Case2718ms
Full turn time: 6000ms–8000ms

Mistral Voxtral Mini

Avg EOU Delay
N/A
Best Case
N/A
Worst Case
N/A

Quality

Soniox STT RT v3

Excellent
WER: 16.2%

Great quality transcription confirmed by user feedback. No repetitions needed. 44% more accurate than Google Chirp 3.

Gulf ArabicMSA

Mistral Voxtral Mini

Non-functional

Produced zero transcriptions for Arabic audio. Tested with and without explicit language parameter.

Features

FeatureSoniox STT RT v3Mistral Voxtral Mini
Real-time streaming transcription
Language hints
Low word error rate
End-of-utterance detection
Multilingual speech recognition (claimed)
Audio understanding

Pricing

Soniox STT RT v3

Free tier
StandardReal-time streaming
$0.005per minute

Mistral Voxtral Mini

Free tier
APIMistral API pricing
Usage-basedper request

Streaming & Integration

CapabilitySoniox STT RT v3Mistral Voxtral Mini
Streaming support
LiveKit plugin
Self-hostable
API styleWebSocket streamingREST
SDKsPython, Node.jsPython, Node.js

Verdict

Good

Soniox STT RT v3

Previously the best option for Arabic STT. Excellent quality with 16.2% WER, but superseded by Deepgram Nova-3 which is 75% faster with comparable quality.

Choose Soniox STT RT v3 if you need:

  • Accuracy-critical applications
  • Arabic transcription quality
Pros
  • +Lowest WER for Arabic (16.2%)
  • +No user repetitions needed
  • +30% faster than Google Chirp 3
Cons
  • -Higher latency than Deepgram Nova-3 (1.7s vs 0.4s)
  • -No LiveKit plugin
  • -Limited SDK support
Non-functional

Mistral Voxtral Mini

Does not work for Arabic at all. Zero transcriptions produced in testing despite claiming multilingual support.

Choose Mistral Voxtral Mini if you need:

    Pros
    • +Part of Mistral ecosystem
    Cons
    • -Completely non-functional for Arabic
    • -Zero output despite audio processing
    • -Misleading multilingual claims

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Which has better Arabic transcription quality, Soniox STT RT v3 or Mistral Voxtral Mini?

    Soniox STT RT v3 has a quality rating of 5/5 (Excellent). Great quality transcription confirmed by user feedback. No repetitions needed. 44% more accurate than Google Chirp 3.

    Is Soniox STT RT v3 or Mistral Voxtral Mini better for production voice agents?

    Both providers are viable options. Soniox STT RT v3: Previously the best option for Arabic STT. Excellent quality with 16.2% WER, but superseded by Deepgram Nova-3 which is 75% faster with comparable quality. Mistral Voxtral Mini: Does not work for Arabic at all. Zero transcriptions produced in testing despite claiming multilingual support.

    How does Soniox STT RT v3 pricing compare to Mistral Voxtral Mini?

    Soniox STT RT v3 starts at $0.005 per minute (Real-time streaming). Mistral Voxtral Mini starts at Usage-based per request (Mistral API pricing).