Arabic Speech-to-Text Comparison

Mistral Voxtral MinivsSoniox STT RT v3

Head-to-head comparison based on real production benchmarks with Gulf Arabic callers.

Overview

Mistral Voxtral Mini

Non-functional

Mistral's speech model — completely non-functional for Arabic.

production testedvoxtral-mini-latest

Soniox STT RT v3

Good

High-quality Arabic STT with 44% lower WER than Google Chirp 3.

production testedstt-rt-v3

Latency

Mistral Voxtral Mini

Avg EOU Delay
N/A
Best Case
N/A
Worst Case
N/A

Soniox STT RT v3

Avg EOU Delay1678ms
Best Case773ms
Worst Case2718ms
Full turn time: 6000ms–8000ms

Quality

Mistral Voxtral Mini

Non-functional

Produced zero transcriptions for Arabic audio. Tested with and without explicit language parameter.

Soniox STT RT v3

Excellent
WER: 16.2%

Great quality transcription confirmed by user feedback. No repetitions needed. 44% more accurate than Google Chirp 3.

Gulf ArabicMSA

Features

FeatureMistral Voxtral MiniSoniox STT RT v3
Multilingual speech recognition (claimed)
Audio understanding
Real-time streaming transcription
Language hints
Low word error rate
End-of-utterance detection

Pricing

Mistral Voxtral Mini

Free tier
APIMistral API pricing
Usage-basedper request

Soniox STT RT v3

Free tier
StandardReal-time streaming
$0.005per minute

Streaming & Integration

CapabilityMistral Voxtral MiniSoniox STT RT v3
Streaming support
LiveKit plugin
Self-hostable
API styleRESTWebSocket streaming
SDKsPython, Node.jsPython, Node.js

Verdict

Non-functional

Mistral Voxtral Mini

Does not work for Arabic at all. Zero transcriptions produced in testing despite claiming multilingual support.

Choose Mistral Voxtral Mini if you need:

    Pros
    • +Part of Mistral ecosystem
    Cons
    • -Completely non-functional for Arabic
    • -Zero output despite audio processing
    • -Misleading multilingual claims
    Good

    Soniox STT RT v3

    Previously the best option for Arabic STT. Excellent quality with 16.2% WER, but superseded by Deepgram Nova-3 which is 75% faster with comparable quality.

    Choose Soniox STT RT v3 if you need:

    • Accuracy-critical applications
    • Arabic transcription quality
    Pros
    • +Lowest WER for Arabic (16.2%)
    • +No user repetitions needed
    • +30% faster than Google Chirp 3
    Cons
    • -Higher latency than Deepgram Nova-3 (1.7s vs 0.4s)
    • -No LiveKit plugin
    • -Limited SDK support

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Which has better Arabic transcription quality, Mistral Voxtral Mini or Soniox STT RT v3?

    Soniox STT RT v3 has a quality rating of 5/5 (Excellent). Great quality transcription confirmed by user feedback. No repetitions needed. 44% more accurate than Google Chirp 3.

    Is Mistral Voxtral Mini or Soniox STT RT v3 better for production voice agents?

    Both providers are viable options. Mistral Voxtral Mini: Does not work for Arabic at all. Zero transcriptions produced in testing despite claiming multilingual support. Soniox STT RT v3: Previously the best option for Arabic STT. Excellent quality with 16.2% WER, but superseded by Deepgram Nova-3 which is 75% faster with comparable quality.

    How does Mistral Voxtral Mini pricing compare to Soniox STT RT v3?

    Mistral Voxtral Mini starts at Usage-based per request (Mistral API pricing). Soniox STT RT v3 starts at $0.005 per minute (Real-time streaming).