Arabic Speech-to-Text Comparison

Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3vsMistral Voxtral Mini

Head-to-head comparison based on real production benchmarks with Gulf Arabic callers.

Overview

Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3

Acceptable

High-quality Arabic STT from Google Cloud, but with significant latency.

production testedchirp-3

Mistral Voxtral Mini

Non-functional

Mistral's speech model — completely non-functional for Arabic.

production testedvoxtral-mini-latest

Latency

Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3

Avg EOU Delay2376ms
Best Case2000ms
Worst Case3000ms
Full turn time: 9000ms–10000ms

Mistral Voxtral Mini

Avg EOU Delay
N/A
Best Case
N/A
Worst Case
N/A

Quality

Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3

Excellent
WER: 28.8%

High quality transcription. Broad Arabic dialect support through ar-XA language code.

Gulf ArabicMSAEgyptianLevantine

Mistral Voxtral Mini

Non-functional

Produced zero transcriptions for Arabic audio. Tested with and without explicit language parameter.

Features

FeatureGoogle Cloud STT — Chirp 3Mistral Voxtral Mini
Real-time streaming transcription
120+ language support
Automatic punctuation
Word-level timestamps
Speaker diarization
Custom vocabulary
Medical and telephony models
Multilingual speech recognition (claimed)
Audio understanding

Pricing

Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3

Free tier
StandardChirp 3 model
$0.016per 15 seconds

Mistral Voxtral Mini

Free tier
APIMistral API pricing
Usage-basedper request

Streaming & Integration

CapabilityGoogle Cloud STT — Chirp 3Mistral Voxtral Mini
Streaming support
LiveKit plugin
Self-hostable
API stylegRPC streaming + RESTREST
SDKsPython, Node.js, Go, Java, C#, Ruby, PHPPython, Node.js

Verdict

Acceptable

Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3

Excellent quality but too slow for real-time voice agents. Best suited for batch transcription or applications where latency isn't critical.

Choose Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3 if you need:

  • Batch transcription
  • Multi-dialect Arabic support
  • Enterprise compliance
Pros
  • +Excellent transcription quality
  • +Broadest Arabic dialect support
  • +Enterprise-grade reliability
  • +Extensive SDK ecosystem
Cons
  • -2.4s average EOU delay — too slow for voice agents
  • -Higher pricing than competitors
  • -Complex GCP setup required
Non-functional

Mistral Voxtral Mini

Does not work for Arabic at all. Zero transcriptions produced in testing despite claiming multilingual support.

Choose Mistral Voxtral Mini if you need:

    Pros
    • +Part of Mistral ecosystem
    Cons
    • -Completely non-functional for Arabic
    • -Zero output despite audio processing
    • -Misleading multilingual claims

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Which has better Arabic transcription quality, Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3 or Mistral Voxtral Mini?

    Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3 has a quality rating of 5/5 (Excellent). High quality transcription. Broad Arabic dialect support through ar-XA language code.

    Is Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3 or Mistral Voxtral Mini better for production voice agents?

    Both providers are viable options. Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3: Excellent quality but too slow for real-time voice agents. Best suited for batch transcription or applications where latency isn't critical. Mistral Voxtral Mini: Does not work for Arabic at all. Zero transcriptions produced in testing despite claiming multilingual support.

    How does Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3 pricing compare to Mistral Voxtral Mini?

    Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3 starts at $0.016 per 15 seconds (Chirp 3 model). Mistral Voxtral Mini starts at Usage-based per request (Mistral API pricing).