Arabic Speech-to-Text Comparison

Deepgram Nova-3vsGoogle Cloud STT — Chirp 3

Head-to-head comparison based on real production benchmarks with Gulf Arabic callers.

Overview

Deepgram Nova-3

Recommended

Best-in-class Arabic STT with ultra-low latency. Production-tested winner.

production testednova-3

Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3

Acceptable

High-quality Arabic STT from Google Cloud, but with significant latency.

production testedchirp-3

Latency

Deepgram Nova-3

Avg EOU Delay424ms
Best Case0ms
Worst Case815ms
Full turn time: 787ms–3821ms

Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3

Avg EOU Delay2376ms
Best Case2000ms
Worst Case3000ms
Full turn time: 9000ms–10000ms

Quality

Deepgram Nova-3

Excellent

Accurately captures Gulf Arabic phrases. No user repetitions needed in production calls.

Gulf ArabicMSASaudi Arabic

Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3

Excellent
WER: 28.8%

High quality transcription. Broad Arabic dialect support through ar-XA language code.

Gulf ArabicMSAEgyptianLevantine

Features

FeatureDeepgram Nova-3Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3
Real-time streaming transcription
Automatic language detection
Endpointing / end-of-utterance detection
Punctuation and formatting
Word-level timestamps
Custom vocabulary
Multichannel support
120+ language support
Automatic punctuation
Speaker diarization
Medical and telephony models

Pricing

Deepgram Nova-3

Free tier
Pay As You GoNova-3 streaming
$0.0043per minute
GrowthVolume discount
$0.0036per minute

Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3

Free tier
StandardChirp 3 model
$0.016per 15 seconds

Streaming & Integration

CapabilityDeepgram Nova-3Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3
Streaming support
LiveKit plugin
Self-hostable
API styleWebSocket streaming + RESTgRPC streaming + REST
SDKsPython, Node.js, Go, .NET, RustPython, Node.js, Go, Java, C#, Ruby, PHP

Verdict

Recommended

Deepgram Nova-3

The clear winner for Arabic STT. Deepgram Nova-3 delivers excellent quality at 424ms average EOU delay — fast enough for real-time voice agents.

Choose Deepgram Nova-3 if you need:

  • Production Arabic voice agents
  • Low-latency real-time transcription
  • Gulf Arabic dialects
Pros
  • +Best latency-to-quality ratio for Arabic
  • +75% faster than nearest competitor (Soniox)
  • +LiveKit plugin available
  • +Generous free tier ($200 credit)
  • +Excellent Gulf Arabic accuracy
Cons
  • -Cloud-only (no self-hosting)
  • -Pricing can scale with high volume
Acceptable

Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3

Excellent quality but too slow for real-time voice agents. Best suited for batch transcription or applications where latency isn't critical.

Choose Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3 if you need:

  • Batch transcription
  • Multi-dialect Arabic support
  • Enterprise compliance
Pros
  • +Excellent transcription quality
  • +Broadest Arabic dialect support
  • +Enterprise-grade reliability
  • +Extensive SDK ecosystem
Cons
  • -2.4s average EOU delay — too slow for voice agents
  • -Higher pricing than competitors
  • -Complex GCP setup required

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is faster for Arabic speech-to-text, Deepgram Nova-3 or Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3?

Deepgram Nova-3 is faster with an average end-of-utterance delay of 424ms, which is 1952ms faster than Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3.

Which has better Arabic transcription quality, Deepgram Nova-3 or Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3?

Deepgram Nova-3 has a quality rating of 5/5 (Excellent). Accurately captures Gulf Arabic phrases. No user repetitions needed in production calls.

Is Deepgram Nova-3 or Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3 better for production voice agents?

Deepgram Nova-3 is recommended for production use. The clear winner for Arabic STT. Deepgram Nova-3 delivers excellent quality at 424ms average EOU delay — fast enough for real-time voice agents.

How does Deepgram Nova-3 pricing compare to Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3?

Deepgram Nova-3 starts at $0.0043 per minute (Nova-3 streaming). Google Cloud STT — Chirp 3 starts at $0.016 per 15 seconds (Chirp 3 model).